October 16, 2007—Here we seem to go again. NASA is presented with a technical problem on the Shuttle and the alternatives, again, are—fix it and delay the launch schedule, or risk flying because "it worked fine in the past". Allow me to explain.
I don’t mean to be alarmist, but NASA has been criticized for making similar decisions in the past with deadly results. In 1986, Roger Boisjoly, of solid rocket booster builder Morton Thiokol, complained that NASA went ahead and launched Space Shuttle Challenger because he couldn’t "prove" that cold weather would make the rubbery o-rings on the Shuttle’s boosters stiff and unsafe. Following the Columbia disaster in 2003, NASA was again criticized for not testing the heavy gray carbon heat shields after it was proven that foam insulation was falling from the Shuttles’ external fuel tanks. Again, NASA lacked the knowledge of whether foam could break one of those shields. During Columbia launch in January of 2003, one shield did break, and the Shuttle was lost.
If NASA replaces the heat shields on Discovery, the vehicle won’t fly until probably December at the earliest. If a launch is attempted and the cracked shields fail, the agency could lose another Shuttle and perhaps another crew. It appears to be a tough call either way. More to come.
Photos courtesy of NASA and University Press of Florida |
|
|